To obtain an in-depth understanding of some of the best modern political thinking regarding States' Rights. Specifically, the research should highlight some of the arguments for giving more law-making ability to states against the central government.
Political thinking and school of thought vary on the need for states to imbibe more law-making ability against the central government. Below are some of our findings:
- The issue of States' Rights often arises when the states and the central government do not agree on a particular subject. In modern times, the fight for States' Rights has mostly been championed by Democrats and Democrat-led states.
- One of the most common arguments for enhancing States' Rights is based on the fact that the US Constitution limited the powers of the federal government to 17 areas and assigned all other powers to the state governments.
- This school of thought proposes that the Founders in their wisdom "recognized the importance of small government close to the governed." State governments are believed to be closer to the people they serve, which leads to more accountability and more efficient use of public funding. The proponents of this argument claim that individual uniqueness and demographics of each state required their state sovereignty to be protected.
Proposed next steps:
You need to be the project owner to select a next step.
In our initial hour of research, we were able to identify a modern school of thought that argues for giving more law-making ability to states against the federal government. We are proposing research to identify 2 - 3 other schools of thought or argument for providing states with more law-making powers.
Also, in line with the goals of your project, we are proposing research to identify 5 - 7 top elected officials (such as senators and governors) who have publicly made comments in favor of States' Rights. We will provide the name of the elected official, their political affiliation, and his/her comment on the topic.