Delivered August 27, 2019. Contributor: Shannon L.
To better understand smart city classifications, revenue models, and whether any are focused on depopulation for new business prospecting.
Preliminary research shows there is available information on the classifications or types of smart cities, their revenue models, and at least three smart city initiatives that are focused on depopulation.
SMART CITY CLASSIFICATIONS
According to Metropolitan Intelligence, there are four types of smart cities:
Real estate investment smart cities where private sector investors, governments, and developers invest in real estate and "put their own new infrastructure, technology, and policies in place to take a controlling position in a way that they expect will provide value to all stakeholders."
Private smart cities that are owned by "investors, technology vendors, and real estate developers who install infrastructure, policy, and governance of their own design that does not include government services, support systems, or social programs available in current cities."
"Do Nothing" smart cities that have leaders with good intentions, but " are out of sync with strategies and programs that could save their city."
A 2016 Smart Cities Survey identified three types of smart cities:
Build-operate-transfer (BOF), which is when the municipality or city planners "work closely with an external private partner, which develops the services and deploys the necessary infrastructure to enable the smart city project."
Build-operate-comply (BOC), which is when government entities "provide a platform for smart city development, regulations that the third parties must adhere to, and an initial source of funding."
Based on a smart cities business model survey, 58% of smart cities rely on federal or central government funding, 45% rely on supranational organizations, 23% rely on other public funding, 21% rely on municipal government funding, and 17% rely on funding from the technology provider. This adds up to more than 100% because smart cities rely on more than one source of funding.
In addition, 42.4% of smart cities have received some sort of grant, 40% have obtained loans, 39.6% received money from other sources, 25% received money from equity, and 13.3% received money from in-kind contributions.
Some smart cities use advertising as a main revenue stream, including Kansas City, which has "installed kiosks throughout a city with maps and local information for restaurants, attractions, events and shopping." The city sells advertising space on these kiosks.
Other smart cities are making more government services available online for a small surcharge that generates revenue for the city.
Smart cities are also using the data obtained by these online services to provide insights at a cost to advertisers and other companies.
According to Deloitte, the following revenue models are currently employed by smart cities:
The European Union is exploring Smart Villages as a way to confront "persistent challenges, such as depopulation and poor quality public services."
This plan aims to "create habitable villages where people can and want to live, because innovative and digital solutions improve their lifestyle."
Lapland, Finland's Arctic Smart Rural Community has the mission of stopping "capital outflow from rural areas." With this plan "300 villages are enabling the creation of sustainable resources and boosting industrial development, curbing depopulation and giving the region new economic and social opportunities."
Only the project owner can select the next research path.